COP30: Key Outcomes and Implications
By The National Climate Fellows at Change the Chamber, December 10, 2025
COP30 sparked hope with new forest and Indigenous protections and climate funding, but the fossil fuel deadlock shows we’re still far from the action the planet urgently needs.
COP30 took place from November 6th to November 21st in Belém, Brazil, with over 56,000 attendees, making it the second-largest UN climate summit to date. The conference is taking place in the heart of the Amazon, and this year’s talks are centered on climate finance, forest protection, and the future of global climate cooperation.
Who Was There
Brazil and China brought the largest delegations. But for the first time in 30 years, the U.S. did not send an official delegation, aligning with the Trump administration’s current stance on climate issues. California Governor Gavin Newsom became the highest-ranking U.S. official on-site, telling attendees that the U.S. “should not be a footnote” in global climate efforts. California’s Food and Agriculture Secretary, Karen Ross, also attended and spoke about California’s efforts in sustainable agriculture.
More than 1600 lobbyists from fossil fuel companies and over 300 lobbyists from major meat, pesticide, fertilizer, and food corporations, including JBS, Bayer, Nestle, Cargill, PepsiCo, and McDonald’s, attended COP30. The pesticide company Bayer brought the highest number of delegates (19) for any single company. Their presence highlights the growing influence of high-polluting industries in climate negotiations. While private-sector engagement can undoubtedly bring resources and innovation, it also raises serious concerns about transparency, conflicts of interest, and the potential weakening of climate commitments, especially at a summit hosted in the Amazon, where many of these companies are driving deforestation.
COP30 also brought participation from environmentally oriented organizations, such as the We Mean Business Coalition, which works with countries to make Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) more attractive to private investors. LIFE Clean Energy Transition, along with several other clean energy and climate adaptation groups, also attended. Although they represented a smaller share of the overall delegates, their presence helped promote renewable energy, decarbonization strategies, and forest protection, often serving as a counterweight to the significant presence of fossil fuel and agribusiness lobbyists.
Brazil had previously committed to major Indigenous participation, with 2,500 Indigenous attendees, but only 14 percent were granted access to the official negotiation area (Blue Zone). Many leaders highlighted the difficulty and expense of the accreditation process, which limits who is allowed to speak inside the room.
Key Week 1 Announcements
Loss and Damage Fund finally opens its first call: The long-promised fund for countries hit hardest by climate impacts issued its first call for proposals–$250 million in total, with grants of up to $20 million each. Most funding to date has come from Europe. The U.S. previously withdrew from the fund’s board.
The $1.3 trillion climate finance debate intensifies: New UN and expert reports outlined paths to scale climate finance from $300 billion today to $1.3 trillion, with roughly half expected to come from the private sector. Negotiations on how to actually reach that number are underway.
Philanthropic groups pledge $300 million: More than 35 major foundations (including Gates, Rockefeller, Wellcome) committed funding for extreme heat, pollution, and climate-related diseases. A new report also shows philanthropy for climate adaptation hit a record $870 million last year.
Key Reports Released in the First Week
China’s emissions may have peaked: Carbon Brief’s analysis shows China’s CO₂ emissions have been flat or falling for 18 months, thanks to huge growth in solar and wind energy.
IEA outlook: renewables booming: The International Energy Agency reported that more renewable energy will be built by 2030 than in the last 40 years combined.
Global Infrastructure Resilience: The Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, which guides countries in making climate-smart infrastructure investments, released its 2025 report. Among other findings, the report discovered that economic losses resulting from service disruptions were, on average, 7.4 times higher than those from direct infrastructure damage.
In related news, COP30 also served as the launch site for the Beat the Heat Initiative, which encourages cities worldwide to collaborate on projects aimed at combating extreme heat in urban areas.
New national climate plans show progress–but not enough. New global pledges (NDCs) put the world on track to reduce emissions 12 percent by 2035 compared to 2019, better than before Paris, but still far from what’s needed. We remain on course for 2.6°C of warming if the updated NDCs are achieved.
Forests & Land Rights: Brazil launched its Tropical Forest Forever Fund, but funding fell far short of the $25 billion target, reaching $5.5 billion. Twelve countries pledged to formally recognize 80 million hectares of Indigenous and local community land rights by 2030.
Carbon Markets: Brazil announced a coalition to align global carbon markets. The EU, China, the UK, Canada, and several others joined.
Combating Climate Misinformation: A new Declaration on Information Integrity was launched to combat climate misinformation, marking the first time countries have formally committed to this goal. Twelve nations have signed so far. While this declaration would not be legally binding, it would encourage participants to increase their accountability and transparency by requesting that the private sector pledge to uphold information integrity and adopt transparent advertising practices. Signing governments would also be called upon to maintain regulations in line with climate and human rights transparency, and to pledge funding for climate research.
Protests and Public Pressure: COP30 saw major demonstrations–Indigenous protesters entered the venue, demanding real representation; The Munduruku community blocked the Blue Zone entrance; and Activists confronted agribusiness lobbyists in the “AgriZone,” a COP30 area sponsored by Nestlé and Bayer. Civil society groups raised concerns about the growing influence of fossil fuel and industrial agriculture interests at the negotiations.
As major pledges and public pressure defined Week 1, Week 2 brought fresh negotiations, political tension, and critical decisions that shaped the final outcome of COP30. As the week progressed, negotiations intensified around the most contentious issue of the summit: whether fossil fuel phase-out should be included in the final decision text. The mood became increasingly tense as countries pushed for stronger commitments while others resisted any binding language.
Key Week 2 Developments
Fossil fuel phase-out debate intensified: Countries pushed for a fossil fuel phase-out to be included in the final COP30 text, but major fossil-fuel-producing nations blocked the effort. A revised draft removed all fossil fuel language, leading 29 countries to warn they could not support an outcome without a roadmap.
Brazil advances Indigenous land demarcations: Brazil announced declaratory ordinances for 10 new Indigenous lands, one of the final steps in the recognition process. With this move, 11 territories advanced during COP30, following strong pressure from Indigenous leaders and Week 1 demonstrations.
Forest finance receives a major pledge but falls short overall: Germany pledges €1 billion (US$1.15B) over the next decade to the Tropical Forest Forever Facility. Despite this contribution, total funding remains at $5.5 billion, far below the original $25 billion target, with at least 20% designated for Indigenous and traditional communities.
Other Key Issues in the Second Week
U.S. absence: Although the United States did not send an official delegation, apart from the governors of California and New Mexico attending independently, the U.S. still influenced climate finance and loss-and-damage discussions.
COP31 host announced: Turkey was selected to host COP31 in 2026 after Australia withdrew its bid in exchange for chairing the talks. The arrangement drew attention from observers and set the stage for next year’s negotiations.
Continuing protests and public pressure: Protests continued throughout Week 2, with demonstrations, art installations, and advocacy centered on Indigenous rights and the phase-out of fossil fuels. More than 1,900 local volunteers supported conference operations, contributing to a highly participatory COP.
COP30’s Crossroad–Progress Made, Promises Deferred
COP30 delivered a mix of progress and disappointment. Countries advanced long-stalled Indigenous land demarcations, increased forest finance commitments, and launched the first operational call for funding to address Loss and Damage. Yet the summit ended without agreement on the central issue facing the world–phasing out fossil fuels. The gap was felt even more sharply in the setting of Belém, in the heart of the Amazon, where reports of forest clearing to prepare the conference site highlighted the contradictions between global climate diplomacy and the realities on the ground. As the world looks ahead to COP31 in Turkey, many will be watching to see whether negotiators can translate the urgency expressed in the Amazon into more ambitious commitments on fossil fuels, finance, and forest protection.
Change the Chamber is a nonpartisan coalition of young adults, 100+ student groups across the country, environmental justice and frontline community groups, and other allied organizations. To support our work, donate or join our efforts!